Wednesday, September 24, 2008

From the Pantheon of Masterpieces

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

From the Pantheon of Masterpieces [-Khmer Royal Ballet]

CAMBODIA: ROYAL BALLET Performers would traditionally accompany royal ceremonies and observances. (Getty Images)

September 23, 2008
The New York Times

If the United Nations cultural agency Unesco approves a proposal from France’s president, French food would join these “masterpieces” on the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage:

CAMBODIA: ROYAL BALLET Renowned for their graceful hand gestures and stunning costumes, performers would traditionally accompany royal ceremonies and observances. This art form, which narrowly escaped annihilation in the 1970s, is cherished by many Cambodians.

LATVIA, LITHUANIA AND ESTONIA: BALTIC SONG AND DANCE CELEBRATIONS Large festivals are held for several days every fifth year in Estonia and Latvia and every fourth year in Lithuania. As many as 40,000 singers and dancers assemble, mostly from amateur groups.

MEXICO: DAY OF THE DEAD This celebration commemorates the return to Earth of deceased relatives and loved ones each year at the end of October and the beginning of November. Families lay flower petals, candles and offerings on a path from the cemetery to their homes.

MOZAMBIQUE: CHOPI TIMBILA Chopi orchestras consist of wooden xylophones, called timbila, made from the highly resonant wood of the slow-growing sneezewort tree.

VANUATU SAND DRAWINGS Multifunctional “writing,” these drawings are produced directly on the ground. Using one finger, the drawer traces a continuous meandering line on an imagined grid to produce a graceful, often symmetrical, composition of geometric patterns.

ZIMBABWE: THE MBENDE JERUSAREMA DANCE A dance characterized by acrobatic and sensual movements by women and men, driven by a polyrhythmic drummer accompanied by men playing woodblock clappers and by women clapping hands, yodeling and blowing whistles.

Friday, September 12, 2008

Tourist Attraction and Activities

Tourist Attractions and Activities

The major attraction of the Siem Reap area is of course the Angkor monuments and other archaeological sites. There are also other features, which can be developed to broaden the tourists' experience and increase their length of stay. Some of the attraction features in the Siem Reap area have been designated as protected areas by the government. Phnom Kulen is designated as a National Park. An-or is a Protected Landscape and the Tonle Sap Lake area is a Multiple Use Management Area.

1. The Heritage of Angkor

The archaeological heritage of the Angkor period of Khmer history comprises one of the most important historic sites and architectural achievements in Asia and the world generally. The famous temples of Angkor were mainly built between the 9th and 13th centuries and abandoned in the middle of the 1 5th century. During this period the Khmer civilization was at the height of its creativity and ruled a vast territory extending from the of what is now Vietnam northward southern Laos and westward through Thailand to Burma. The Angkor complex of temples represents the rains of the capital and religious centre (Angkor means the capital) of the Khmer Empire because they are built of stone and brick Palaces, houses and public buildings were constructed of wood and long since decayed. Having been constructed over several centuries, various different styles and Hindu and Buddhist religious beliefs are represented at Angkor.

The entire historical development covers approximately 5,000 square kilometers of which the capital city complex occupies about 300 square kilometers. A total of 1,000 archaeological features, including pre-Angkor sites, were identified by the ZEMF survey from existing records and new studies, using aerial photography, satellite imagery, and ground and helicopter field surveys. Of the 900 Khmer features, some 300 are temples and another 300 could indicate the sites of temple structures. The complex includes not only the buildings but also moats, barays (reservoirs), canals and irrigation works. The largest barays, now called the east and tourists can visit west barays.

National Parks: natural and scenic areas of significance rice for their scientific. educational and recreational values. The following parks are designated:

  • (1) Kirirom,
  • (2) Phnom Bukor,
  • (3) Kep,
  • (4) Ream.
  • (5) Botom Skat,
  • (6) Phnom Kulen,
  • (7) Virachey.

Wildlife Sanctuaries: natural areas where nationally significant species of flora and fauna, natural communities, or physical features require specific intervention for their perpetuation. The following sanctuaries are designated:

  • (8) Aural,
  • (9) Peam Krasop,
  • (10) Phnom Samkos,
  • (11) Ronien Daun Sam,
  • (12) Kulen - Promtep,
  • (13) Beng Per, (14) Lomphat,
  • (15) Phnom Prich,
  • (16) Phnom Nam Lyr,
  • (17) Snoul.

Protected Landscapes: nationally significant natural and semi-natural landscapes, which must be maintained to provide opportunities for recreation and tourism, are

  • (18) Angkor,
  • (19) Banteay Chhmar and
  • (20) Preah Vihear.

Multiple Use Management Areas: areas, which provide for sustainable use of water resources. timber, wildlife, fish, pasture and recreation with the conservation of nature primarily orientated to support these economic activities. They include

  • (21) Doing Peng,
  • (22) Samlaut and
  • (23) Tonle Sap.

The West Baray extending over an areas of 2.2 by 8 kilometers has been partially restored and currently being used to store water for irrigation. The hydraulic engineering involved is as equally impressive as the building architecture. Constriction of the monuments, barays and irrigation works obviously required highly centralized organization of large populations in labour-intensive work

Considerable archaeological research has beer, carried out at Angkor. Resulting form the 19th century re-discovery of Angkor and concern about the deterioration of the monuments, the Ecole Francaise d'Extreme Orient (EFEO) began work on the site in the early 1900s. The research and restoration work of EFEO revealed the richness of the Khmer culture to the world and stimulated interest in tourists visiting Angkor. Research and restoration continued through the 1960s. From 1908, the Conservation d'Anakor or the Angkor Conservation Office conducted or-site maintenance and restoration work. This once adopted a policy for forest protection and management in 1911, and dealt with maintenance, forestation, the opening of access roads and the clearing of vegetation around each monument. In 1925, a central area was officially designated as the Angkor historic Park.

In 1979, the Angkor Conservation Office was revived with a minimal staff, and in 1986 Indian and Polish assistance was provided. Since 1989, UNESCO has coordinated multi-lateral assistance for restoration of building at the Conservation Office, maintenance and visitor safety at important sites, clearing moats, and technical studies and restoration activities at selected monuments with the cooperation of various other organizations. Much is still unknown about the site and Angkor civilization and archaeological research needs to be continued. Maintenance and preservation of the monuments still require much more work and is a long-term continuing process.

The government has adopted conservation zoning for Angkor. A protected archaeological zone is designated within which new development including tourism development will not be permitted. Other cultural zones are designated to protect archaeological sites including those, which are yet to be excavated.

The most visually sine and visited temples are Angkor Wat, Bayon and Ta Prom.
Also popular are Banteay Srei, and Preah Khan and Bakong in the Roluos group. Several other temples are impressive in their own way and visited by tourists. The touring circuits at Angkor are the 27-kilometer Petit Circuit and 46-kilometer Grand Circuit. These were laid out over 60 years ago when less was known about the site and they do not represent the historically correct or visually most rewarding approach to the temples. It is well recognized that improvements are greatly needed to the interpretation and presentation of Angkor. A visitor centre should be developed to provide information material, exhibits, sales of crafts and books on Angkor and other facilities. This centre is being planned for development by APSARA. A site museum could be developed either as part of the visitor centre or as a separate project. Interpretive signs, in an attractive and uniform design, are required at the various sites. The road network connecting the monuments needs improvement and perhaps some realignment. Parking at the major sites should be improved. Guide services are currently available but the knowledge of many guides could be enhanced. All aspects of Angkor, including the barays and irrigation works and the historical and cultural context of the Angkor civilization, should be presented to tourists so that they understand the background of the monuments.

Sales of crafts and souvenirs at the sites require better management and hawking must be controlled. As referred to previously, the residents in the Angkor monuments area are very low income, which leads to hawking of many of these people including children as a source of income. Alternative employment should be organized for residents including being trained to work effectively in the park and tourism enterprises.

A sound and light show- has been proposed at Angkor Wat, and this can help interpret the monument in an interesting manner. The show will provide an evening activity that is now lacking in the area and induce tourists to stay longer at the site. Assurance has been given that installation of the show gill is carried out so that there is no damage to the monument. APSARA should be involved in determination of the best approach to develop the sound and light show. Fees will, of course, be charged to attend the show, which can provide additional revenue.

A performance of the Ramayana was organized at Angkor Wat in 1995 and was considered to be very successful. This type of performance should be organized on a regular basis each yea. or more often as an important attraction for local and foreign visitors and an expression of an important aspect of Cambodian and Asian cultural heritage. It would be interesting to re-introduce local animals, of the type that previously lived there, into the Angkor environment. Elephants, monkeys and deer particularly would be appropriate.

Entry fees are charged foreigners visiting Angkor at the rate of US $20 for one day, $40 for two-three days and $60 for four-seven days. Entry charges on tourism vehicles are currently S2 per taxi, 55 per mini-bus and $10 per large bus. Cambodian nationals are admitted at a nominal fee. In addition, payments are made for use of Ministry of Tourism tour guides. These entry fees are not out of line with entry fees paid at major archaeological sites elsewhere in the world, especially when site interpretation is improved at Angkor. In 1995, total revenue was estimated at almost US $1.3 million. Entry to the monuments is not greatly controlled, and it is known that some visitors gained entrance without paying any fees.

As more tourists visit the monuments in the future, the revenue from fees will greatly increase. The fees now go to the government general fund, and are not used to improve Angkor. Much work on conservation and interpretation is needed at Angkor and the fees can be an important source of revenue for this purpose. It is important that all or a major proportion of the fees be used to assist with the conservation and interpretation at Angkor. In addition to providing the revenue needed for conservation activities, tourists will be more willing to pay the fees if they know it is being used for conservation and interpretation.

Although Angkor has many monuments and is spread over a wide area, some of the temples are particularly popular and visited by virtually all tourists. As the number of visitors increases in the future, the carrying capacities of some of the monuments may be reached or exceeded based on present patterns of use.

2. Other Attraction Features in the Area

The Angkor monuments comprise the major attraction and, as emphasized previously all aspects of the Angkor period should be included in the interpretation and tours of Angkor so that tourists pair. full exposure to the monuments. This approach will involve visits to different areas of the monuments including the Roluos and Banteay Srei groups of temples, the West Bar ay where one can swim and go boating to a small island and visit the ruins of West Bebou temple, and relic irrigation works.

  • Phnom Krom Hill - Lying 13 kilometers to the south of Siem Reap town, this hill commands superb views over the Tonle Sap Lake and its port and floating villages. At the top of the hill is a 9th century temple of some interest. A road leads up the slope to the hilltop. Wat Athvea can also be included on this trip.
  • Phnom kulen national park - This park is not new accessible because of the poor sate of the-road and safety problems, but is a potentially important natural feature for tourists in the future. The major features of the park are the waterfalls and generally scenic environment, complemented by forest vegetation and wildlife.
  • Tonle Sap and floating villages - The floating villages located in the northern part of the Tome Sap Lake are highly interesting to visit by boat. Stops could be made at one or two of the structures to observe fish farming and other activities. Complementing the villages is the unusual character of the lake itself with its rich fish and bird life and local fishing techniques. The road to the port on Tonle Sap is being improved, although. access to the floating villages is most easily accomplished during the rainy season. This tour can include the nearby Phnom Krom Ell as a stopover.
  • Town tours - Siem Reap is a basically attractive town complemented by the river environment and large trees. In the old town centre are architecturally interesting historic colonial buildings with traditional buildings in the peripheral areas. Specific interesting buildings include the 'palace' and the Grand Hotel, now being renovated. The new central market will be of interest to tourists. A half-day tour can be organized based on the interesting features of the town. Also, self-guided walking tours could be promoted with production of a walking tour map and guide. The compact character of central Siem Reap is conducive to walking
  • Crocodile farm - Already existing in Siem Reap, the crocodile farm is open to tourists. Besides crocodiles, the farm has exhibits of monkeys, birds and deer. It could be improved with better interpretation techniques.
  • Village tours - The villages in the Siem Reap area are still traditional and offer insight into life in rural Cambodia. Tours can be organized to selected villages with stops at the villages to observe the local life styles, architecture and agricultural techniques. It is important that village stops be pre-arranged and suitable payments be made to the villages to allow tourist visits. The villagers to finance community projects such as infrastructure, school and medical clinic improvements can use this revenue.
  • Provincial museum - A provincial museum could be developed in Siem Reap that presents the history, culture and environment of the area. This would be in addition to any site museum developed at Angkor.
  • Crafts - As previously mentioned, Siem Reap has a tradition of silverwork, silo textile wearing and basket making, but only a few- people still know these artisan skills. Crafts can be of much interest to tourists and an important source of income for residents, including the villagers. Expansion of crafts should be encouraged as tourism develops. The new market in Siem Reap town can include a crafts section and a handicraft centre already is developed a few kilometers out of the town.
  • Sports and recreation - There are no sports facilities available to tourists in Siem Reap. However, discussion is underway for development of the former Olympic Stadium on the road to Angkor as a sports club similar to the International Youth Club in Phnom Penh This will primarily serve residents including resident foreigners but can be open to tourists. The new hotels planned for the area are expected to include swimming pools, tennis courts and other recreation facilities. Some of the larger existing hotels could also develop swimming pools.
  • Evening entertainment - Evening entertainment for tourists is presently limited in Siem Reap, except for going to restaurants. There are some nightclubs but these cater mostly to a local clientele. One of the hotels now offers ;traditional Khmer dance and music show. As mentioned, a sound and light show is proposed for Angkor Wat. A cultural centre may also be developed. It is expected that the new hotels planned for development will include provision for evening entertainment.

3. Detailed description of the temples

Siem Reap is the province rich in groups of big temples which consists of:

a. GROUP OF ANGKOR TOUCH TEMPLE:

Located in Siem Reap District, North of the provincial town of Siem Reap about 7 km from the provincial town by Ko May Road .

b. GROUP OF ANGKOR THOM TEMPLE:

Located about 10 km from Siem Reap provincial town through the connecting road from Angkor Touch temple. The group of Angkor Thom temples consists of the temples of Bayon, Bapuon, Vimean Akas, Prolean Chol Damrey, Bali Lay, Suor Proat having 12 peaks, Khlang Khang Cheung, Khlang Khang Tbong, the group of Phreah Pithu temples with 3 temples, Viheah 17 Lveng, and terrace of Sdach Kumlung with five statues of Phrea Thom each has 5 m high consisting of Pheah En Tep, Preah Ang Ngut, Preah Tep Pro Liem and Preah Sang Tuk.

c. SMALL CIRCLE:

Located about 12 km from Siem Reap provincial town. The Small Circle consists of a group of temples including Thorm Nun temple, Chao Say Tevada, Stone bridge, Ta Keo temple, Ta Ney temple, Ta Prum temple, Bon Tey Kdey temple, Sras Srong (pond) and Kro Van temple.

d. BIG CIRCLE:

Located at 13 kilometer distance from the provincial town of Siem Reap. The Big Circle consists of a group of temples of Neak Poan, Kruol Ko, Ta Som, East and West Mebon temple, Pre Rup temple and Sras Srong (pond).

e. BANTEAY SAMRE TEMPLE:

Located at Preah Dak commune, Banteay Srey District via Angkor Wat about 16 km from Siem Reap provincial town.

f. BOK MOUNTAIN:

Located at Ka Van Commune, Banteay Srey District about 25 km from the Siem Reap provincial town by NR No. 6.

g. BAKONG TEMPLE (GROUP OF ROLUOS TEMPLES):

Located at Au Luok village, Bakong Commune, Prasat Bakong District about 15 km from Siem Reap provincial town of NR No. 6.

h. BANTEAY SREY TEMPLE:

Located at Banteay Srey village, Banteay Srey commune, Banteay Srey District about 32 km from Siem Reap provincial town.

i. KULEN MOUNTAIN:

Located in Svay Len and Va Rin Districts about 48 km from Siem Reap provincial town.

j. CHUP PREAH:

A plain spot where cool water flows located in the valley of Kulen mountain. Next to it, there is a rare big Cham Pa tree measuring 0.7 m in diameter and 15 m high. At Chup Preah, there is a big Buddha statue surrounded by many other small statues made during the 16th century.

k. A THOUSAND LINGAS:

Located on the Kulen mountain, along the Siem Reap river and thousand of figures of Yonis and Lingas scarved on the riverbed.

l. TERRACE OF SDACH KUMLUNG:

A plain terrace on Kulen Mountain covered by lava for hundreds years with a small temple ruins made of solid brick in the middle.

m. PREAH ANG THOM:

A big Buddha statue who had achieved nirvana. The statue was built in the 16th century as an 8 m long statue carved onto a big rock. Preah Ang Thom is the sacred and worshipping god for Kulen Mountain.

n. WATERFALLS:

On Kulen Mountain, there are two waterfall spots:

  • First Waterfall: 4 to 5 m high and 20 to 25 m wide during the dry and rainy seasons.
  • Second Waterfall: 15-20 m high and 10 to 15 m wide during the dry and rainy seasons.

o. FLOATING VILLAGE:

The village is named Chong Khnoas located in Chong Khnoas village, Chong Khnoas commune about 15 km from Siem Reap provincial town.

Original Source


Cambodia's heritage going cheap

Cambodia's heritage going cheap
By Frances Suselo

PHNOM CHISOR, Cambodia - Reet grew up among the hilltop ruins of this district about an hour's drive from the capital, Phnom Penh, learning how to count by going up and down its 412 steps.

It is also at the area's local school that the 14-year-old boy learned about the looting of antiquities from the 11th-century hilltop temple, also called Phnom Chisor. Now, he tells visitors, "There is no looting here."

The community around the ruins runs a program to educate villagers about the Phnom Chisor temple, made in Baphuon and Khleang architectural style from laterite and sandstone. Jutting out to the sky from the 100-meter hill, Phnom Chisor was built by



Suryavarman I, the king of the Khmer Empire, for the god Brahma in 1010. The Angkorian temple is more or less intact, unlike many other ruins such as Koh Ker, capital of the Khmer kingdom in the 10th century, or even parts of Angkor Wat in Siem Reap province.
Looting at Phnom Chisor is often done by poor villagers who sell the artefacts for small amounts, which then find their way to local or international markets. International auction houses do not make enough effort to ensure items are not obtained illegally, argues Dougald O'Reilly, founder and director of Heritage Watch, a Phnom Penh-based non-governmental organization.

An ancient looted head would probably bring a local a mere US$1, but then could be sold for a hundred times that amount in a Bangkok market - and much more outside Asia, said Terressa Davis, project coordinator of Heritage Watch.

Meantime, Reet notes that Cambodian law forbids looting of the country's antiquities. What would he do if someone offered him a lot of money for something from the ruins? His eyes blazed as he answered: "I won't do it because it's illegal. Besides, I know it's a bad thing to do."

"Officers from the Ministry of Culture have made it very clear that looting is prohibited," a monk at a modern Buddhist temple beside the ruins said. "People are more informed now, so they will not be tempted to loot. We all have a duty to protect our own cultural heritage."

The total value of cultural assets, both counterfeit and original, smuggled each year is about US$22 million, O'Reilly said, quoting Masayuki Nagashima, the author of Lost Heritage: the Reality of Artefact Smuggling in Southeast Asia.

Worldwide, trafficking in stolen works of art and national treasures is valued at up to $8 billion a year, according to the Art Theft Program of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, which calls the trade "a major category of international crime".

Interpol says the annual dollar value of art and cultural property theft is exceeded only by trafficking in illicit narcotics, money-laundering and arms-trafficking.

The looting of artefacts also means the loss of crucial information about the past: social and political structures of society, pre-historic health, ancient technologies, records of border trade, as well as art and architecture.

Many other Asian countries experience differing degrees of looting. But the popularity of Khmer artefacts along with porous borders and lack of resources add to the problems in Cambodia. Activists admit it is hard to curb the demand for stolen antiquities.
So, groups such as Heritage Watch focus on education campaigns to prevent looting or encourage communities to protect their heritage by training villagers to develop new skills, such as managing small businesses and producing crafts to sell to tourists.

But Heritage Watch's Davis said 80% of the catalogues of international auction houses have no provenance (information on items' origins) and this does not help efforts to protect Cambodia's heritage.

"They can simply say that a vase is done in Ming style, but they won't say where exactly they got it from," Davis said. "The absence of provenance could mean either they really don't know where the item came from, or the information could be incriminating. People assume that because they are big companies, they follow the law, when in fact they are operating under a very thin veil of decency."

But Wannida Saetieo, country manager of Sotheby auction house in Thailand, said the company is a "proper public company" that has always followed the law. "At Sotheby's, we always try our best to ensure that all items are genuine and not acquired through illegal means," she said. Before an item can be sold through Sotheby's, the owner must show documents certifying ownership, she added, but conceded the company "cannot guarantee 100% that an item is not stolen".

"If we know that there is only one item and that the item is in a museum somewhere and if someone comes with an item that looks alike, then we know it's a fake," she said.

But "it's the responsibility of the buyer to also do their own background check on any item", she added, flipping over a Sotheby magazine to its back pages to show the company's disclaimer.

She also stressed that Thailand forbids the taking Buddha statues out of the country. "There is a big demand for them, but we don't sell them because it's illegal."

Provenance on Sotheby's catalogues can be absent because wealthy owners guard their privacy and prefer not to see their names printed for the whole world to see, she said. "These people are very, very private."

National and international laws and conventions exist to make theft and trafficking harder, but they are not always adequate.

In 1996, Cambodia's National Assembly adopted the law on the Protection of Cultural Heritage, which covers "movable and immovable objects and cultural property from vandalism, illicit transfer of ownership, excavations, illicit export and import".

In the same year, Cambodia claimed all cultural properties for the state, making the selling of Khmer antiquities illegal.

But to recover a stolen artefact, the government has to prove theft by producing a picture of the item in its original site before it was stolen. Most pictures of Khmer antiquities in their original sites were taken in the 1930s by the French, so this loophole has added to the difficulty of prosecution.

Stolen Khmer artefacts are usually smuggled out either by sea to Singapore or by land to Poipet, a Cambodian town on the border with Thailand, Heritage Watch founder O'Reilly said.

Smugglers take advantage of the fact that Singapore and Thailand are not signatories to the 1970 UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) convention that prohibits the import of stolen cultural property and requires countries to monitor the antiquities trade within their own borders.

Cambodia has ratified the 1995 UNIDROIT (International Institute for the Unification of Private Law) Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, which declares that "A possessor of a stolen cultural object must return it regardless of personal involvement or knowledge of the original theft."

This allowed the Cambodian government to negotiate with Thailand in 2001 and 2002 for the restitution of 43 Cambodian cultural artefacts, which had transited through Singapore. A 9th-century stone head of Shiva and a 12th-century stone head of a demon were also returned by the Honolulu Academy of Arts in 2002.

For now, small teams of local experts from Heritage Watch continue documenting Cambodia's ruins, so there is visual evidence in case some artefacts go missing and turn up somewhere halfway around the world. These teams also use illustrated comic books in Khmer to explain why villagers should protect their temples and ruins.

Heng Chan Thol, a former student of the Archaeology Department of the Royal University of Fine Arts in Cambodia, believes that "Poverty alleviation and education should be the main efforts to get rid of this phenomenon."

For instance, "The Apsara Authority, in charge of protection and preservation of Cambodian cultural heritage has tried bringing local people to work as guards for local historical sites. As a result, the looting in Siem Reap [Angkor Wat] has almost completely disappeared," he said.

"One day, they will be held accountable," Davis said of traffickers in stolen antiquities. "Art collectors, looters and smugglers will face the same discrimination as those who profit from ivory and fur today."

(Inter Press Service)

Original Source

Monumental Dilemma

Monumental Dilemma

As visitors flock to Angkor Wat, the Cambodian government is leveraging the popularity of its most famous landmark. Christopher R. Cox reports

From December 2004

By Christopher R. Cox

The steep climb will be worth it, I remind myself. In the dry-season heat, sweat streams down my face as I scramble over rocks and roots toward the summit of Phnom Bakheng. Four years ago, the panorama from the hilltop temple was memorable and mystical: to the east, the towers of Angkor Wat budding through the forest canopy; to the west, an enormous reservoir, shimmering at sunset like molten metal.

I had lingered atop the silent, 1,100-year-old temple with a few Buddhist monks and a dozen other travelers.

Two hundred feet below, the dust bowl now swells with the blare of traffic, idling buses, and shouting vendors. When I finally reach Phnom Bakheng, I've got company: more than 1,000 people clog the upper tiers while a group floats nearby in a hot-air balloon. I'd expect such a sundown spectacle in Key West, but not at the ancient ruins of Angkor, a 154-square-mile park encompassing more than 100 historic structures, including Angkor Wat, the best-known. Just a decade ago the area was at the mercy of the jungle, looters, and Khmer Rouge rebels. Well into the nineties, horse carts outnumbered automobiles in the provincial capital of Siem Reap, where a handful of guesthouses put up the few travelers who'd weathered the 200-mile journey from Phnom Penh. Land mines riddled the sprawling park complex. Pol Pot was holed up in the mountains along the Thai border, 70 miles away; his soldiers ambushed tourists near outlying temples.

That recent history seems as remote as the 12th-century reign of Jayavarman VII, who erected the majestic Bayon, Ta Prohm, and Preah Khan temples. Pol Pot died in 1998; his guerrilla movement collapsed the following year. Thanks to a concerted international effort, the plundering of Angkor's sculptures nearly ceased. Mines were cleared, the forest was cut back, collapsed stonework was painstakingly reassembled—and the influx of travelers began.

In the past year, approximately 1 million people visited Angkor and Siem Reap, spending tens of millions of dollars on lodging, meals, guides, and DANGER! MINES! T-shirts.

The shift was bolstered by an "open skies" policy that allowed international carriers to fly directly to Siem Reap, eliminating the costly transfer in Phnom Penh. The number of foreign visitors has nearly quadrupled since 1999, from 83,000 to 321,557 in 2003. (In total, Cambodia received 701,014 visitors last year and an estimated $525 million in tourism revenues.)

The site has held up because of a coordinated effort by the United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Apsara (a Cambodian authority created by governmental decree in 1995), and organizations like the World Monuments Fund (WMF). Security patrols operate around the clock to prevent theft, vandalism, and illegal logging within the park. To alleviate choke points along the guidebooks' lockstep itineraries, a traffic-management plan has been drafted and bypass roads built. Because of such progress, UNESCO removed Angkor from its list of endangered World Heritage sites this summer.

The transformation of the seemingly timeless landscape has been so swift and scattershot, however, that even Angkor's boosters worry that the temples and town may soon be swallowed by their own success. Management of Angkor now falls on Apsara, whose deputy director general, Seung Kong, admits that the increasing number of tourists is causing concern. "Yet we cannot refuse," Seung tells me. "Our policy is conservation but also development, because we need money."

It is hard to criticize one of the poorest countries in Asia for hitching its tourist industry, and a substantial portion of its long-term economic development, to attractions like Angkor Wat. French explorer Henri Mouhot's 1863 account of the jungle-choked area created a sensation in the West; the lost-city fantasy resonates still in films such as Tomb Raider and Two Brothers.

As evocative as the monuments are for foreigners, they provoke an even deeper response in Cambodians. Angkor Wat lies at the core of Khmer culture and ethnic pride, its beauty and grandeur empowering a haunted people.

The aid-dependent government also views the region as an unprecedented business opportunity. In 2001, Prime Minister Hun Sen replaced Apsara's preservation-minded director with an official who soon declared: "The decade for conservation is over. The decade for development has begun." The temples served as a backdrop for a 2002 charity fund-raising concert by tenor José Carreras, but Apsara has resisted subsequent proposals to install sound-and-light shows and an escalator at Phnom Bakheng.

Three miles south of Angkor Wat, however, once-sleepy Siem Reap is a different story. When UNESCO representative Étienne Clément first arrived in 1991, he slept in a windowless storeroom at Conservation d'Angkor rather than at Siem Reap's shabby, solitary hotel.

"Badly equipped," Clément recalls. "The price was negotiable at the desk. It was just a few dollars. There was no lift, no facilities, just one dish offered in the restaurant."

By 1997, Raffles International had restored the moldering Grand Hotel d'Angkor to its five-star, colonial-era glory. Sofitel soon built an enormous property a stone's throw away, and Pansea opened a boutique hotel along the Siem Reap River. Across the waterway, the former provincial police station has become an upscale restaurant-bar, the Foreign Correspondents' Club.

That's the good news. Boxy, charmless ventures, many with ties to Cambodian generals or politicians, clutter the airport highway. Zoning requirements, such as height restrictions, are routinely flouted. Apsara's planned development, the 2,500-acre Angkor Tourist City, remains devoid of hotels or shops. Last year there were 57 hotels, 27 resorts, and 120 guesthouses in the town itself—a total of 4,528 rooms.

Public services have not kept pace. Properties run their own generators to avoid blackouts. Without a public water supply, they also operate their own wells. Overconsumption has lowered the aquifer, says Tim Winter, a young English scholar who came to Siem Reap to research a book about Cambodian identity and international tourism, and the long-term effect could potentially threaten temple foundations.

"The infrastructure is grossly inadequate to support all the hotels," says Riaz Mahmood, manager of the Raffles Grand Hotel. "There is no will. There is no master plan. We firmly believe Cambodia has a lot of potential, but I think it's about time the government got its act together."

Seung would like to preserve Siem Reap's intimate character; he pleads, however, that "it is not easy for Apsara to achieve. Many people would like to get money. They build the hotel or the guesthouse or the restaurant, and have no respect for the law."

Unlike Luang Prabang, Laos, where the entire old royal capital has been designated a World Heritage site, Siem Reap falls outside the Angkor protected area, Clément explains.

"The initial vision of zoning, where Angkor would be a place of preservation and Siem Reap would be the place of economic development—you see the legacy of that now," Winter says. "[The town] is seen as open to the market, and in Cambodia that's fairly anarchic, chaotic, and less than transparent."

The short-term strategy has sowed social ills. Children skip school to hawk trinkets. Prostitutes now operate from massage parlors or prowl riverside clubs. "These are big and growing problems," Winter says, "and they are being fueled by tourism."

Thousands of prospective workers have migrated from other provinces, squatting in the park or settling in slums on the east side of the booming town. Siem Reap's population has almost quintupled since 1995, to more than 100,000 people.

At my boutique hotel, the 18-room Shinta Mani, a class of 14 at-risk youths receives free training in the hospitality industry. A mile away, in a raised wooden house south of town, Morimoto Kikuo gestures at the rows of looms and spinning wheels filling his Institute for Khmer Traditional Textiles, where 400 employees create silk sarongs and scarves. "This way they can survive," says the Japanese weaving expert.

Clément, for one, believes Siem Reap is salvageable."I'm not sure that it's a success story, but it's certainly not a disaster," he says. "We are now in a situation to be monitored."

Meanwhile, the region's allure grows. For the month of June, Siem Reap's tourist arrivals were up 226 percent over 2003; first-half figures for this year indicate a 43 percent increase in visitors to Cambodia over the prior year. For many package tourists, however, Angkor is a hermetic experience; the average stay in the country is five days.

To expand its tourism industry, the Cambodian government needs to aggressively leverage Angkor, says Don George, Lonely Planet's global-travel editor. "I think for a certain amount of time, putting all the eggs in one basket is okay," remarks George, who has been tracking Cambodia for decades. "But they need to use that portal to introduce other attractions in the country. If they don't, they run the risk of having a lot of their finances centered in one little area, which will cause all kinds of social imbalances. And over time, the tourist stream will slow to a trickle.

"In people's minds, they fly into Siem Reap, do Angkor, and get out," he adds. "That's a huge missed opportunity for Cambodia."

In an effort to extend visitors' trips, Apsara has opened some of the more remote temples, including the 12th-century Beng Melea, which lies 25 miles east of town and rivals Angkor Wat in size. For a grimmer day trip, there is Pol Pot's final bastion of Anlong Veng, a collection of decrepit huts scattered across a jungled, heavily mined escarpment 70 miles north of Siem Reap. Through its Web site, the Ministry of Tourism (www.mot.gov.kh) also promotes Kompong Som, the country's lone seaside resort, and the remote northeastern province of Rattanakiri, which is home to hill tribes and wildlife.

But developing a national tourism industry will be "a real uphill struggle," Winter says, especially given the head start other Southeast Asian nations enjoy. That's a shame, because Cambodia remains a place filled with discoveries: the floating villages of Tonle Sap lake; the old French quarter of Battambang; the eerie, abandoned hill station of Bokor.

One humid morning, Alice Harvey of WMF leads me through the half-restored ruins of Preah Khan, four miles north of Angkor Wat. We enter from the east, following the old royal processional route, avoiding the busloads of tourists streaming from parking lots west of the temple. We have this section of Preah Khan, with its giant statues of Garuda and its rock-strangling ficus trees, nearly to ourselves.

I follow Harvey over massive stone thresholds, admiring the decorative lintels overhead. The light dims as we work our way through stone corridors toward the central sanctuary's cruciform shrine. There she turns north, tracking the scent of incense to a wizened Buddhist nun.

Harvey pokes through a few smaller rooms, then stoops and smiles. This is her secret, sacred place. A shard of light cuts through the half-collapsed roof, revealing a tumble of stones, a few offerings of joss sticks and garlands, and a small, delicately carved figure of Lakshmi, the Hindu goddess of fortune.

The chamber is silent, graceful, and cryptic, inspiring the frisson that Mouhot must have experienced upon his first encounter with Angkor's inscrutable, ancient beauty.

A feature reporter for the Boston Herald, CHRISTOPHER R. COX last wrote for Travel + Leisure about East Timor.


Original Source

Can Angkor be saved?

Can Angkor be saved?

France Bequette

BENEATH the aircraft's wing at sunset, the broad marshy moat dotted with white egrets, the three rectangles of covered galleries, the terraces and the five high, sculpted towers of Angkor Wat are all tinged pink. We are privileged to be flying over the best-known temple of the unique complex of monuments that is Angkor--in old Khmer, the name means "the city" or "the capital". Here, on a plain 200 square kilometres in extent in north-eastern Cambodia, between the Kulen plateau and the Tonle Sap ("Great Lake"), a dozen Khmer rulers of the ninth to the twelfth centuries built seven capitals containing many temples. Some are hidden in the jungle, where they are even more inaccessible because of the presence of the Khmer Rouge, who after holding power from 1975 to 1978 and killing upwards of a million Cambodians, took refuge in this region near the Thai border. The temples are all that now remains of the ancient capitals, for only the gods had the right to stone or brick buildings. The palaces and dwellings were built of wood, and they have since disappeared without trace.

RECONCILING TOURISM AND CONSERVATION

Nature, not human wrath, has destroyed these marvellously rich monuments. The heat and humidity of the tropical climate encouraged the unbridled growth of kapok and "strangler fig" trees, popularly associated with rains because their roots destroy monuments.

Today the principal temples have been freed of the vegetation that held them in its grip. Only the Ta Prohm temple has deliberately been left in the midst of the thickets in which the French missionary Charles Bouillevaux and, later, the naturalist Henri Mouhot found it in the mid-nineteenth century. Since 1898, the year in which the French Far Eastern School (the Ecole Francaise d'Extreme-Orient, or EFEO) was founded, a steady stream of archaeologists have worked on the site. They patiently cleared away the undergrowth, dismantled and then reassembled the monuments, and in 1908 created the "Conservation d'Angkor" to which the most threatened statues were taken.

According to Bernard Philippe Groslier of the EFEO, a former curator of the site, "There is hardly anything in the world comparable to the Angkor complex in terms of the number, size and perfection of its buildings." But this masterpiece is in grave danger, and in 1989 the four main Cambodian political parties asked UNESCO to assume the coordination of international activities for the preservation of the monuments of Angkor. In December 1992 Angkor was placed on the World Heritage List.

In view of the scale of the conservation problems involved, UNESCO'S World Heritage Committee placed a number of conditions on Angkor's inclusion on the List, insisting that a legal framework for conservation work and a management plan should be drawn up, and that an authority should be established with the resources to manage the entire Angkor area. UNESCO'S first task was to help the government to set up a Cambodian Authority for the Protection of the National Heritage, which was formally approved in February 1993. UNESCO has also worked with the Cambodian government and a group of international experts on a Zoning and Environmental Management Plan (ZEMP) for the authorities, donors and local people as well as visitors. This comprehensive document takes into account Angkor's assets as well as the dangers threatening the site.

The archaeological treasures are particularly at risk from lichens, microscopic algae and bacteria that proliferate in the guano of the many bats living in the ruins. The ZEMP also cites the destructive effects of monsoon rains, the vegetation, and variations in the underground aquifer that influence the stability of the buildings. Other factors include uncontrolled agricultural development after deforestation, the influx of thousands of tourists and the construction of hotels to replace existing facilities that are not up to international standards. The region badly needs revenue from tourism, but there is also a risk that it may suffer from it. Angkor is a "new" destination that travel agencies are now adding to a circuit that includes Thailand, Laos and Viet Nam.

Statistics show that in 1992 35,000 tourists visited Siem Reap, the base for excursions to the temples. If forecasts turn out to be accurate, between 300,000 and 700,000 foreigners and between 100,000 and 500,000 Cambodians will visit Angkor in the next five years. The figures represent a sizeable market, and fourteen big hotel chains are already hoping for a share of it. There is growing concern since two hotels had been built previously beside the moat of Angkor War with little regard for the site. (They were subsequently burned down by the Khmer Rouge). Is it only a matter of time before there are pleasure boats, theme parks and neon signs?

To avoid this kind of desecration while permitting sustainable development of the region, the ZEMP suggests dividing the site into zones. The Angkor Parks, comprising five of the ancient capitals including Angkor Wat, Angkor Thom and Preah Khan, would be given maximum protection. They would be located within an Angkor Cultural Reserve. On the other hand there would be no restrictions on new residents coming to join the 350,000 people already living in the area, nor on their techniques of farming or forest management.

A WAY THROUGH THE MINEFIELDS

Much remains to be done for the management of water resources before Angkor can reclaim the reputation it once had as a "hydraulic capital". The prosperity of the early Angkor empires was closely linked to irrigation. A network of dykes and canals served to control flooding and to provide water in the dry season from huge reservoirs called "barays", all of which are now abandoned with the exception of the Western Baray, which has been restored in this century. The temple moats were both sacred boundaries and sources of water and of food in the form of fish and lotus, whose fruits contain a mealy substance from which bread can be made. Now, however, they have silted up and are clogged with vegetation.

Other, more immediate dangers also threaten the Angkor region. There are estimated to be twelve million mines in northern Cambodia. A French company, COFRAS, which has trained Cambodian mine disposal squads, has been attempting to clear the eight minefields identified at Angkor. Three hundred and sixty mines have already been removed. The only way one can reach the temple of Ta Nei and the eastern entrance to Angkor Thorn--the so-called Gate of Death--is by following a mine disposal squad. Countless people--adults and children--have been killed by the mines or have lost limbs. In addition, armed and trained Khmer Rouges are operating in the vicinity, terrorizing the local population by sporadic raiding.

In these circumstances, it is very difficult to prevent the looting of sculptures that every year causes the sanctuaries to deteriorate further. The thieves prize loose with chisels the wonderful faces of the heavenly dancers known as apsaras, cut the heads off statues, and in some cases remove the statues wholesale, even those weighing more than a ton. The protests of the Cambodian government, of UNESCO and of the International Council of Museums (ICOM) have no effect on the traffickers, who know where they can get vast sums of money for the statues.

The task of coordinating international aid that the Cambodian government has entrusted to UNESCO is a difficult one. Only one archaeological excavation is currently under way, and that is the EFEO's investigation of the Terrace of the Leper King. Without co-ordination and political determination to protect the site, Angkor could well fall into the hands of unscrupulous businessmen seeking quick profits from the curiosity of tourists and the poverty of the local population.

Angkor has a special place in the memory of humanity. Let us hope that the international community will wake up to the fact soon enough to take the urgent action that is needed to save, protect and rationally develop this irreplaceable treasure.

FRANCE BEQUETTE is a Franco-American journalist specializing in environmental questions. Since 1985 she has been associated with the WANAD-UNESCO training programme for African news-agency journalists.

COPYRIGHT 1994 UNESCO
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning

Original Source